|
|
|
Home (click here for the RSU Homepage)
|
Examination of global philosophical issues related to law and politics, focusing on the relationship between law and morality, the nature and functions of law, traditional concepts of justice, and contemporary discussions of political legitimacy. COURSE
OBJECTIVES
By faithfully completing all the reading assignments,
successfully writing the three essays, and actively participating in the
discussions, you should be able to do the following by the end of the
semester:
This course will emphasize discussion and writing. I
will regularly suggest questions pertaining to the material we will be
discussing in the following class. Students should come to class prepared
to address these questions. Always
bring your books to class. There will be three three-page critical essays
(approximately 1000 words each), one presentation/performance, a midterm,
and a final exam. Each paper is worth 10% of your final grade; the oral
performance, 10%; participation, 20%; the midterm, 20%; and the final,
20%. All essays must be typed and double-spaced, with
margins of 1.25 inches. Three pages means three full pages. Unexcused late
work will be penalized 10% per day. All essays are due at the beginning of
the class period. Due dates for the essays are listed in the course
schedule, below. Further details on the nature of these essays, as well as
of the midterm and final exams, will be given in class. This is an upper-division course. As such, it will require a great deal of work on your part. The readings are often difficult, sometimes long, and occasionally both. All essays should be polished, well-written, and persuasive. You should plan to devote 8-10 hours per week to your work in this course, in addition to the scheduled class meetings. All student work will be judged according to the following academic criteria:
SUPREME COURT OPINIONS Every student will be assigned to a group of students
later in the semester. Those students will constitute a group of Supreme
Court Justices ruling on a particular issue. Each group should begin by
making a 7-10 minute presentation, and will then lead the class in
discussion of the issue for the rest of the period. This presentation is
10% of your grade. Every member of the group must be in class the day
of the presentation. Every
student will also write an opinion for the issue in question (this is the
third of the three required essays), which will eventually become either
the majority opinion (the decision of the court), a concurrence, or a
dissent. Further information on these
presentations will be given in class. LAST WORDS My office hours are listed above. Please feel free to
come by, call, etc., during those hours. If that doesn’t work, I would
be happy to schedule an appointment at another time. Communication by
email is especially welcome (moderation in this, as in all things...). Finally, realize that it is not unusual for a course like this one to raise challenges to and doubts about some of our most cherished beliefs. It is important that each of us is sensitive to the views of those around us. At the same time, each of us should also be aware that controversial issues, arguments, and positions will be discussed in this course. If something bothers or offends you, let me know and I will do what I can.
This
schedule may be revised as necessary during the course of the semester.
“It is not the province of the court to decide upon the justice or injustice, the policy or impolicy, of these laws. The decision of that question belonged to the political or law-making power; to those who formed the sovereignty and framed the Constitution. The duty of the court is, to interpret the instrument they have framed, with the best lights we can obtain on the subject, and to administer it as we find it, according to its true intent and meaning when it was adopted.”
|
|
LINKS
Here are some links that you may find useful, interesting, or even both. If you have any questions about specific pages that you see here, feel free to ask me. Enjoy. General Supremes Stuff: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ http://www.oyez.org/oyez/frontpage Roe v. Wade http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=410&invol=113 Planned Parenthood v. Casey http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=505&invol=833 I pledge allegiance... http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/06/26/pledge.allegiance/ Lawrence and Garner vs. Texas http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=02-102#dissent1 http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/26/scotus.sodomy/index.html Bush v. Gore http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html Need a copy of the US Constitution? Try this: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
SUPREME COURT GROUPS First, this is the link that has all the cases: http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/003771.php There you will find a link to a brief discussion of the case, plus links to additional resources (lower court rulings, briefs, etc.). EVERYONE looks up EACH of the cases below. Everyone needs to know the basic issues of every case. Then your group should look at the additional resources, plus sites listed below which contain links to even more stuff. Remember that every member of your group will file one opinion, but will need to be familiar with and cast their vote in two cases. Good luck. Please contact me with any questions or problems. Group 1: Crystal, Lorie, Stacey, Kyle, Eric Parents v. Seattle: http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/003697.php Scott v. Harris: http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/004069.php Group 2: Chris, Matt, Heidi, Jennifer, Angela B. Gonzales v. Carhart/ Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood: http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/003376.php, http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/003732.php Panetti v. Quarterman: http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/004241.php Group 3: Robert, Douglas, Angela K., Jesse, Cody Morse v. Frederick: http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/004162.php Ledbetter v. Goodyear: http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/003741.php Each group, make sure to look up your two cases on this site as well (FindLaw): http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/docket/index.html
| |