Paper #2 Topic

 

Imagine that there are two candidates for the position of State Superintendent of Public Instruction, an elected post in Oklahoma, and that these candidates are Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan. .  You have been asked to give a talk to a community group.  They want to know how these candidates stand on certain issues.  They also want to know which candidate you favor, and why.

Using the materials provided in The Scopes Trial: A Brief History With Documents, prepare an essay for this purpose.  In particular, identify the views of Darrow and Bryan with respect to:

            1. the purposes of public education (particularly at the high school level),

            2. the proper locus of control (e.g., parents, teachers, local community);          

            3.  the role of experts in education.

Then tell us which candidate we should support, and why you think so.  (Don’t waffle or suggest that they are really saying the same things.  They disagree.)

            Your essay should be in the range of three to five pages, typed, double-spaced, 12-point font.  Be sure to make direct references to the views of Bryan and Darrow as stated in the primary sources (provide page numbers for each reference).  The introduction is very useful, but is no substitute for the documents themselves.  A paper that simply rehashes the introduction won’t be adequate.

            The course should provide everything you need. The use of other materials of any kind is strongly discouraged because it will require extra time and will divert you from the primary sources.  If you do consult any other materials, provide a works-consulted page with full bibliographic data.

            The quality of your presentation (e.g., appearance, grammar, word selection, punctuation) is important. Take pride in your work and express yourself as precisely as you can.  And remember that the paper you submit mist be entirely your own work. 

            The deadline is Friday April 7 at 5:00 P.M

            Something to keep in mind:  the focus here is on views about education, not on Darwin or the Scopes Trial or the Tennessee law.  You may have strongly-held convictions on one or more of these matters, but those views should not be reflected in the paper.  If they creep into your draft, cut them out.  We are trying to get at educational issues that are broader than the place of Darwinian evolutionary biology in the curriculum.